David Davis
Many decades ago, my father – a scientist – described to me as a small boy a kind of injury out of pure scientific interest, caused by a stiletto heel making a self-shaped depressed-skull-fracture. It was like a trepanning-wound only small and D-shaped.The injuree was invariably male, in the 1950s and 1950s.
It was called “somebody-or-other’s syndrome” (I can’t google it sadly) named after the usual obscure central-European-Physician who first described it. Not Kleinfelter’s, nor Münschausen’s, but something like that.
Clearly, today’s new-labour girls, fired up by GramscoFemiNaZism and enragement that “models” and “WAGs” have invaded their “partners’ ” text-messaging, have moved on. This poor man had his entire eye taken out, and the fracture-zone passed into his brain.
Stiletto heels are good. At least, on short-girls, which is the right sort to be, they are.
They make the female stance and walk more exciting to watch, which is their primary courting purpose, and also they bring her secondary sexual characteristics up nearer to yours when you have got her in a hug. This is the next most important objective, and ideally leaves her still shorter still than you, which is necessary or else you would need to stand on a box, which means that your name is Bernie Ecclestone (and that would not be good.)
If she injured him in a taxi, then although we do not know the circumstances, I suggest one of the following:-
(1) He is “NSIT” *** which means he made a pass privately in the taxi, was rejected, and was rejected utterly and suddenly (unlikely that she would react so violently)
(2) She discovered he’d given his phone to a mate who sent pictures of him (taken earlier) to a call-girl, while pretending the pics were of the sender (possible these days)
(3) She read his credit-card-statements and decided to injure him about the massage-parlour-stuff on the way home after a date (likely)
(4) She was annoyed that he’d posted pics of himself on Facebook, with a former girlfriend on holiday in Ibiza the year before (very probable in today’s climate of opinion)
(5) She was annoyed that he’d not glassed-up a dude who looked at her in the pub (also sadly probable).
*** “not safe in taxis”
I’m going to make a prediction.
The woman will make claims of having suffered emotional abuse. She will end up with some sort of conditional discharge. The man may receive some sort of ‘compensation’ for his injury, but it will be paid for out of taxes and not by the attacker.