Will the stateless society which is mass immigration friendly fight as a unified cohesive whole or will there be too many divisions, free riders and even fifth columnists?
Discover more from The Libertarian Alliance
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
This rather begs the question of: who would attack a stateless society in the first place?
A state launches an attack on another state with the aim of forcing that state into surrender, which implies that the structures by which the losing state is governed is turned over to the control of the winning state (or, at least, altered to the winning state’s satisfaction).
If there is no state, no governing structure, then there is no resident of that territory with the authority to surrender on behalf of anyone except themselves (and possibly their household dependents). How, in that case, would victory be defined, except by mounting a total scorched-earth attack aimed at forcing each and every individual resident to surrender personally, one by one, or be killed?
We have empirical evidence for this difficulty in the form of Somalia, where the state imploded utterly, thus rendering the only global superpower, the USA, impotent to enforce its will there.