Note: Beyond insisting that the British Government should have no involvement of any kind, the Libertarian Alliance takes no position on foreign wars. However, as a service to our readers, we reproduce here a debate on the current unpleasantness in the Middle East, between Walter Block and Hans-Hermann Hoppe. AB
A mob of Islamist Arabs incited by Jew-hatred entered the town and killed as many Jews as they could find. They went door to door, broke into the homes of their victims, and slaughtered innocent men, women and children. These gangs raped, mutilated and tortured them while screaming “Kill the Jews!”
That was 94 years ago, on Saturday, Aug. 24, 1929, in Hebron. The picture is essentially the same, only that then the Arab riots that included this massacre ended with 133 Jews murdered. This time, it is several times as many, and we don’t know the final figure.
Given that the events are virtually the same, the question is: Why? There was no state of Israel in 1929. There were no “occupied” territories, no “settlers.” There was no “blockade.” No security fence, no checkpoints, nothing. If the excuses of today’s murderers did not exist at that time, what did exist? A deep, maniacal, murderous and utterly destructive hatred of Jews—the same essential factor operating today, to which all other excuses are subservient.
It has been the policy of the state of Israel not to show what its enemies do to its citizens. That both kept the victims’ dignity and prevented the demoralization of Israelis. But it also avoided letting the world see clearly what kind of threat Israelis were dealing with. What kind of true evil they are fighting against. Now that is clear. The videos showing mass murder; the kidnapping of children, elderly and women; the storming of a music festival to shoot and kill whatever person they could find; and the stories of rape, execution and utter destruction are there for the world to see.
These images and videos were propagated by the assassins themselves. They use them to show their strength and prove Israeli weakness. To demonstrate to the Palestinian Arab population that the Jews can be killed like flies. What does it say of a society that these monsters think this type of “propaganda” is a “good” way to mobilize the population? It screams of a deeply perverse and murderous culture, in love with death and destruction. It is the same culture that teaches toddlers to hate. The same society that pays wages to mass murderers and celebrates on the streets with sweets and shootings when Jews get killed. It is the culture that creates the types of monsters capable of the evil they themselves proudly show to the world through social media.
“From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free!” chant the useful idiots at elite institutions and parades in the West. Who are these people? Atheists who support theocratic lunatics, democrats who endorse medieval tyrants, feminists who defend misogynists who parade with the desecrated corpses of women, gays who defend maniacs who would joyfully hang them or toss them off the roof of a tall building. They talk of a secular, democratic and socialist Palestine. As George Orwell observed: “One has to belong to the intelligentsia to believe things like that: no ordinary man could be such a fool.” But the world has now seen what “from the river to the sea” actually means. It is nothing less than a remake of the Nazi Einsatzgruppen.
Israel expelled its own population from Gaza in 2005 so that Palestinian Arabs could begin building their own state. They instead chose Hamas. The enemies of Israel aren’t in favor of a Palestinian state. They aren’t in favor of anything positive, but only of a negative: the denial of life, especially of Jewish life. The goal is genocide. The method is mass murder of the type Jews haven’t experienced since the Holocaust.
Hence, the West needs to understand that to defend human life and dignity, it isn’t enough to claim to side with Israel. It needs to understand what this means: total, unrestrictive support. That is nothing less than allowing this beleaguered country to defend itself fully. To recognize that Hamas needs to be destroyed for the same reason and by the same method that the Nazis were. Israel is entitled to do whatever it takes to uproot this evil residing next to it. And, more important, that once it begins to proceed in that direction, it won’t be demonized for defending that which is the core of Western civilization and which its enemies hate the most: the love of everyone’s right to human life, dignity and happiness.
In other words, it needs to support a complete, total and decisive Israeli victory. If this implies an overwhelming, unprecedented use of military force, so be it. Hamas is and will be responsible for any civilian casualties. Cause and effect. They created their own destruction, and its consequences.
Mere victory isn’t enough. Israel has won every war it has ever fought. This time, the triumph must be so thorough and conclusive that there will never be any other war for this country. Israel has a moral right to finish the job, and the West has a moral duty to support it. Let Israel do what it must to finish this war in the fastest way possible, with the minimum civilian and military casualties on its side. The consequences of this lie on the group that initiated the causal sequence—the one that must be completely destroyed, Hamas.
Messrs. Block and Futerman are the co-authors of “The Classical Liberal Case for Israel.”
Originally published:
Er… there were settlers in Palestine in 1929. And Zionist leaders at the time including Chaim Weizmann and Ze’ev Zhabotinsky made clear they intended to create a Palestine that was “as Jewish as the Cotswolds are English”. This is a matter of historical record. This doesn’t mean the events of 1929 – **IF** correctly stated by Walter Blok – are admirable, but the fact is that Jews were arriving from Europe with an explicit intent of pushing the native population out. And Walter wonders why the local population resented that? Words fail me! Walter is an ethnocentric identitarian. Walter ignores the fact that Hamas went to Israel in order to kidnap Jews – itself a clear crime, of course – but not to kill civilians. The Israeli press has reported that Israeli military tactics were responsible for most of the civilian deaths, including tank fire at buildings where Hamas militants were holding hostages. Stories of rape and killing babies have all been repeatedly refuted. A good article on this is at https://www.unz.com/jcook/why-is-the-media-ignoring-evidence-of-israels-own-actions-on-7-october/
Er… there were settlers in Palestine in 1929. And Zionist leaders at the time including Chaim Weizmann and Ze’ev Zhabotinsky made clear they intended to create a Palestine that was “as Jewish as the Cotswolds are English”. This is a matter of historical record. This doesn’t mean the events of 1929 – **IF** correctly stated by Walter Blok – are admirable, but the fact is that Jews were arriving from Europe with an explicit intent of pushing the native population out. And Walter wonders why the local population resented that? Words fail me! Walter is an ethnocentric identitarian. Walter ignores the fact that Hamas went to Israel in order to kidnap Jews – itself a clear crime, of course – but not to kill civilians. The Israeli press has reported that Israeli military tactics were responsible for most of the civilian deaths, including tank fire at buildings where Hamas militants were holding hostages. A good article on this is at https://www.unz.com/jcook/why-is-the-media-ignoring-evidence-of-israels-own-actions-on-7-october/
I’ll have to remember Orwell’s wise words. The good really did die young in his case. Aren’t libertarians supposed to believe in open borders? I also remember the Mohammed cartoons of2006 with Trots lining up alongside Islamic fundamentalists. They truly deserve each other!