There is something ironic about a state-funded propaganda outlet like Deutsche Welle (DW) lamenting the threat of “right-wing extremism” while calling for censorship: ironic—though not unfamiliar. Its latest whine is against Tommy Robinson— a whine framed as a worried inquiry into whether Elon Musk is “aiding” him. Because this is a story in the foreign media, it offers a good illustration of how the regime media constructs narratives to delegitimise dissent.
For those unfamiliar, Deutsche Welle is Germany’s taxpayer-funded international broadcaster—a propaganda arm of the German state with about as much journalistic independence as Radio Berlin International had under Erich Honecker. DW claims to provide “objective” and “independent” news, but it is little more than an ideological enforcer for the ruling class. Imagine the BBC, but even more sanctimonious and even less self-aware.
The DW article wrings its hands over the fact that Tommy Robinson—long a critic of the British ruling—has found a new audience on X (formerly Twitter), thanks to Elon Musk’s relaxation of political censorship. The insinuation is clear: Free speech is dangerous when it allows Robinson to speak, and Musk is now complicit in spreading dangerous ideas. The solution? The British Government is right to intervene to “rein in the power of the US tech giant with new laws.” In other words, Musk must be bullied into silencing people DW and its paymasters disapprove of.
This is not about “extremism.” It is about control. When a state media organisation calls for laws to “rein in” speech, it means censorship. It means ensuring that only voices approved by the regime are heard. Of course, this means silencing anyone critical of the immigration policies and the growing authoritarianism of Western governments.
Again, an explanation: for those who only know him through regime media hysteria, Tommy Robinson (real name Stephen Yaxley-Lennon) is a long-time activist who has focused on issues such as mass immigration and its resulting Islamist extremism, and on police corruption. His work exposing grooming gangs—often ignored by the Regime for politically convenient reasons—earned him a reputation as a critic not to be either ignored or tolerated.
Whether one agrees with him or not is irrelevant. The principle at stake is simple: Robinson should have the absolute right to express his views to any audience willing to listen. It is the hallmark of a free society that people can say controversial things without state persecution. The fact that this is open for debate shows how far Europe, as well as Britain, has fallen.
The double standard is glaring. DW and its ideological allies never seem concerned about left-wing extremism. Open incitement to violence by Antifa? No problem. Or how about radical Islamists using social media to spread their beliefs? That’s just cultural expression. But Tommy Robinson criticising the ruling class? That is a national emergency requiring new censorship laws.
The BBC has long been Britain’s most shameless state broadcaster, but DW manages to be even more servile. At least the BBC occasionally pretends at neutrality. DW, on the other hand, does sound like press release from East German Government: you can almost hear the stuttering teleprinter. It is an open voice for the German ruling class and its allies in the European Union and Britain, who are nervous about their progressive collapse of control over the public narrative. The more they push for censorship, the more obvious their fear becomes.
In the end, this article is not about Tommy Robinson. It is about the authoritarian instincts of a ruling class that, having lost control of the public conversation, now seeks to suppress it by force. And that is far more dangerous than anything Robinson has ever said.

Discover more from The Libertarian Alliance
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
