A common belief is that the barbarian invasions were a destructive flood that swept away the Western Roman Empire. The truth is that the Western Empire was already in serious trouble before the Barbarians crossed the Rhine—misgovernment, population decline, and factional conflict had fatally weakened its structure. The Vandals were not an exception to this rule. Their migration into Africa was not an act of sheer savagery, but part of a broader pattern of accommodation and settlement that saw many groups assume control of Roman provinces. The Vandals were neither uniquely destructive nor uniquely alien to Roman civilisation.

The stereotype of the Vandals as savage destroyers is misleading. They were Christians—albeit of the Arian persuasion—and many of their leaders had served in Roman armies before assuming power in Africa (Conant, Staying Roman, 2012). Latin quickly became their language of governance, and within a generation, they were virtually indistinguishable from the Roman aristocracy they replaced (Merrills & Miles, The Vandals, 2010). They ruled through Roman institutions and used familiar administrative structures to govern their African kingdom (Heather, The Fall of the Roman Empire, 2005).

Indeed, the invasions were often given official approval from Constantinople. The Franks were tolerated because they were Nicene Christians. The Ostrogoths in Italy were led by Theoderic, who had an official position within the imperial administration and was even allowed to nominate one of the annual consuls. The Vandal kings in Africa had married into the family of Theodosius the Great and had formal treaties with the Empire that recognised their rule (Procopius, The Vandal War).

Luxorius, a rather competent if rather dull poet of the Vandal period, gives us an invaluable insight into life under Vandal rule. What is most striking is his assumption that life had continued exactly as before. There is nothing in his poetry to suggest that the educated classes of Carthage suffered under Vandal rule. His complaints are not about oppression or economic hardship, but about the fact that his audience preferred the classics to his own efforts:

Priscos cum haberes, quos probares, indices,
lector, placere qui bonis possent modis,
nostri libelli cur retexis paginam
nugis refertam friuolisque sensibus,
et quam tenello tiro lusi uiscere?
set forte doctis si illa cara est auribus
sonat pusilli quae leporis commate
nullo decora in ambitu sententiae,
hanc iure quaeris et libenter incohas,
uelut iocosa si theatra peruoles.

The economic evidence backs up this picture. Carthage remained a major trading hub, and its economy does not appear to have collapsed under Vandal rule. While some towns shrank, this was a trend observable across the Empire (Ward-Perkins, The Fall of Rome and the End of Civilization, 2005). Vandal coinage suggests an economy that was both stable and innovative (Merrills, Vandals, Romans, and Berbers, 2004). The idea that Vandal rule led to economic ruin is simply not borne out by the evidence.

The religious history of Vandal Africa has been distorted by later accounts. It is true that there were periods of persecution under certain kings, particularly Huneric, but there was no consistent policy of repression. In many cases, the Nicene Church was allowed to function without interference, and Nicene Christians continued to hold prominent positions (Barnwell, Emperors, Bishops and Barbarians, 1992). The real story is one of religious competition rather than outright suppression.

The African Church had been deeply divided even before the Vandals arrived. The Donatist schism had already caused decades of sectarian violence, and the Vandals’ preference for Arian Christianity merely added another layer to these conflicts (Conant, Staying Roman, 2012). If anything, the Vandal state stabilised the situation by providing patronage to Arian clergy while allowing Nicenes to continue their activities in a limited form. The situation was far less catastrophic than later Roman historians would have us believe (Merrills & Miles, The Vandals, 2010).

By the time of Justinian’s reconquest, Africa was no longer a purely Roman province, but neither was it entirely Vandalic. The two populations had merged to a remarkable degree. Many of the leading families in Carthage were of mixed Roman and Vandal descent (Pohl, Post-Roman Transitions, 2013). Roman officials served in Vandal courts, and there was no clear ethnic divide in the administration (Pohl & Heydemann, Strategies of Identification, 2013).

Indeed, the resistance to the Byzantine invasion shows how deeply the Vandals had rooted themselves in Africa. Far from welcoming their “liberators,” many Africans sided with the Vandals. Peasants took up arms against the Byzantines, and some local nobles actively plotted against Belisarius (Procopius, The Vandal War). When Belisarius executed Laurus, a local noble suspected of conspiring with Gelimer, it was a warning to others who saw the Vandals as their preferred rulers (Clover, The Late Roman West and the Vandals, 1986).

Seen from the perspective of 500 AD, the barbarian invasions were not a disaster. The newcomers had assimilated. So far as they were not fully integrated, they still provided more stable rule than the last imperial governors. The barbarian kingdoms had official recognition from Constantinople and, in some cases, the approval of the Church.

Everything went wrong when Justinian tried to reverse history. His war of reconquest was not greeted with enthusiasm in Africa. It brought destruction, heavy taxation, and military occupation. The African provinces, which had been stable under the Vandals, were thrown into turmoil (Merrills, Vandals, Romans, and Berbers, 2004). Local revolts against Byzantine rule continued for years, and the region was so weakened by the conflict that it fell easily to Arab invaders a century later (Conant, Staying Roman, 2012).

Had Justinian left the West alone, the barbarian kingdoms might have solidified into stable post-Roman states. The Vandals, Franks, and Ostrogoths were ruling in a recognisably Roman manner. They were adapting, merging, and evolving. It was not the Vandals who ruined Africa, but the blind imperial ambitions of Constantinople.

Primary Sources

• Augustine, Contra Maximinum.
• Cassiodorus, Variae.
• Corippus, Iohannis.
• Luxorius, Anthologia Latina. Edited by A. Riese.
• Procopius, The Vandal War. Translated by H.B. Dewing. Harvard University Press.
• Salvian, De Gubernatione Dei.
• Victor Vitensis, Historia Persecutionis Africanae Provinciae. In Monumenta Germaniae Historica.

Secondary Sources

• General Studies on the Vandals and Late Antiquity
  • Clover, F. (1986). The Late Roman West and the Vandals. Cambridge University Press.
  • Heather, P. (2005). The Fall of the Roman Empire: A New History of Rome and the Barbarians. Oxford University Press.
  • Merrills, A., & Miles, R. (2010). The Vandals. Oxford University Press.
  • Ward-Perkins, B. (2005). The Fall of Rome and the End of Civilization. Oxford University Press.
• The Vandal Kingdom and Its Society
  • Barnwell, P. (1992). Emperors, Bishops and Barbarians: The Transformation of the Roman World. Cornell University Press.
  • Conant, J. (2012). Staying Roman: Conquest and Identity in Africa and the Mediterranean, 439–700. Cambridge University Press.
  • Pohl, W. (2013). Post-Roman Transitions: Christian and Barbarian Identities in the Early Medieval West. Brepols.
  • Pohl, W., & Heydemann, G. (2013). Strategies of Identification: Ethnicity and Religion in Early Medieval Europe. Brepols.
• Economic and Cultural Perspectives
  • Merrills, A. (2004). Vandals, Romans, and Berbers: New Perspectives on Late Antique North Africa. Ashgate.
  • Rich, J. (2016). Decline and Fall of the Roman City. Oxford University Press.
  • Whelan, R. (2018). Being Christian in Vandal Africa: The Politics of Orthodoxy in the Post-Imperial West. University of California Press.
  • Onesti, N. (2005). Language and Identity in Vandal Africa. Brepols.
• Religion and the African Church
  • Berndt, G., & Steinacher, R. (2014). Arianism: Roman Heresy and Barbarian Creed. Ashgate.
  • Dossey, L. (2013). Peasant and Empire in Christian North Africa. University of California Press.
  • Shaw, B. (2011). Sacred Violence: African Christians and Sectarian Hatred in the Age of Augustine. Cambridge University Press.
  • Kahlos, M. (2009). Debate and Dialogue: Christian and Pagan Cultures in the Fourth Century. Ashgate.
• Justinian’s Conquest and Its Aftermath
  • Amory, P. (1997). People and Identity in Ostrogothic Italy, 489–554. Cambridge University Press.
  • Curta, F. (2010). The Other Europe in the Middle Ages: Avars, Bulgars, Khazars, and Cumans. Brill.
  • Steinacher, R. (2018). The Vandals: The History of a Dynasty. Princeton University Press.

Related posts:

Phthiriasis: The Lousy Death of Kings and Tyrants

Powered by YARPP.