I was actually asking for two captions, Johnathan.
I put the first one up showing the quizzical-loooking Great Ape, and than I added the President of the USA later.
But since “racism”, as understood by Courts of Law, is a-priori an artificial neo-Nazi construct, not based on any kind of scientific or liberal classical logic but merely meaning what someone thinks it means at the time of speaking, then we here who are (through what or own writings say) completely blind to human-typological differences, cannot possibly be accused of “racism”.
Anyway, we’ll wait and see what transpires, Johnathan. But on reflection, I appreciate your concern in pointing it out: the actual juxtaposition of images is perhaps unfortunate, although no harm was meant.
Careful guys, that smacks of racism (yes, I am being serious).
I was actually asking for two captions, Johnathan.
I put the first one up showing the quizzical-loooking Great Ape, and than I added the President of the USA later.
But since “racism”, as understood by Courts of Law, is a-priori an artificial neo-Nazi construct, not based on any kind of scientific or liberal classical logic but merely meaning what someone thinks it means at the time of speaking, then we here who are (through what or own writings say) completely blind to human-typological differences, cannot possibly be accused of “racism”.
Anyway, we’ll wait and see what transpires, Johnathan. But on reflection, I appreciate your concern in pointing it out: the actual juxtaposition of images is perhaps unfortunate, although no harm was meant.