David Davis
Well, how surprising.
And he agrees.
Share this:
- Share on PayPal (Opens in new window) PayPal
- Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- Print (Opens in new window) Print
- Share on Nextdoor (Opens in new window) Nextdoor
- Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
- Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
- Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
- Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
- Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
- Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
- Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
- Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
Related
Discover more from The Libertarian Alliance
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Related posts:
The Politically Rich versus the Politically Poor
Libertarian Delusions and the Machinery of Empire: Welfare as Alibi, Not Engine
“Contingent Libertarianism” Dissected – a Further Reply to Bryan Mercadente
Free Trade – Understanding the Economic Case
An Examination in the Philosophy of Liberty
The Case Against AI
The May 7th 2026 West Surrey Local Elections
Notes on the “People’s Emergency Briefing” film
Fallacies of Wealth Redistributionism
Ninety-Five Blasts from the Past
A possible structure for just governance
The Leftist Assault on Western Thought
Powered by YARPP.
But there’s nothing actually incorrect about Thomas the Tank Engine, in a political sense or otherwise. We kick ourselves every time we acknowledge such idiotic commentary. The author claims the programme is bad because the trains have to work, so what is she saying, nobody ought to have to work? She’d be hunting wildcats and the like in the Canadian forests if nobody worked. As bigoted and biased as anything you’ll ever hear, her thesis.