Repudiating Britain’s National Debt: An Inevitable Reality Already Unfolding

The Libertarian Alliance is a factory of radical and often original ideas. Running a motelโ€”making sure the showers are kept clean, for exampleโ€”means that I often miss things when they first appear. But I have now read Bryan Mercadenteโ€™s argument for outright repudiation of the British national debt, published on December 13 2025. This strikes me as not only morally justified and strategically soundโ€”but also, in all but name, already happening. Mercadente has the clarity to see what the British political class will not admit: the entire structure of Britainโ€™s public finances is a criminal enterpriseโ€”engineered to loot the productive classes while enriching a parasitic elite of financiers, bureaucrats, and foreign governments. What he proposesโ€”an explicit refusal to honor illegitimate debtsโ€”is not radical. It is merely the political formalization of what is already occurring through financial subterfuge: the slow-motion default of inflation.

The system, as it stands, is built on a lie. Successive British governments have borrowed trillions without the consent of the people. Not one of the major debt expansionsโ€”the 2008 bailouts, the COVID farce, the endless funding of foreign wars and ideological programsโ€”was ever subjected to a meaningful democratic mandate. Yet the public is expected to pay, indefinitely, through taxation and the gradual erosion of their living standards. The morality of repudiation is not in doubt. What remains is only whether it will be done with honesty and purposeโ€”or through the coward’s route of monetary debasement.

The Western monetary regimeโ€”Britain includedโ€”has already chosen default. It has merely done so dishonestly. The slow theft of inflation is the chosen mechanism, not because it is efficient, but because it is deniable. Politicians will never stand before the British people and say, โ€œWe cannot repay this debt.โ€ Instead, they inflate the currencyโ€”shrinking the real value of what is owed, while erasing savers and punishing anyone on a fixed income.

This is not hyperbole. It is arithmetic. As of January 2026, gold trades above $5,000 per ounce and silver has broken $100. These are not speculative blow-offs. They are signalsโ€”price alarms triggered by the silent crisis of state insolvency. The central banks pretend otherwise, but the public, at some level, understands: the pound is being debased. And so, capital flees into real assetsโ€”into gold, into silver, into anything not tied to the sinking ship of fiat.

The explosion in precious metals prices is often lazily attributed to โ€œsafe-haven demandโ€ or โ€œgeopolitical tension.โ€ That is part of the story, but not the core. These metals are rising because they are real, and the currencies in which they are priced are not. Western governments are no longer functioning as monetary authorities. They are functioning as debt laundriesโ€”running continuous inflation to keep their creditors paid in devalued coin.

The rise in silver, in particular, illustrates this truth. Silver has long been the suppressed cousin of goldโ€”a small, volatile market easy to manipulate, easy to dismiss. JPMorgan didnโ€™t merely play games in that marketโ€”they paid nearly a billion-dollar fine for manipulating it. Spoofing, paper selling, and strategic price suppression were not conspiracy theories. They were established regulatory facts.

But even the fraud can no longer contain the reckoning. Industrial demand for silverโ€”solar, electrification, data centersโ€”has created real physical tightness. The derivatives shell game has lost its effectiveness. And now, as both gold and silver soar, the old gold-silver ratioโ€”a barometer of monetary sanityโ€”is compressing violently, reflecting the crumbling faith in paper promises. This is not a market in which governments can hide forever. It is a market that punishes lies.

Mercadente correctly identifies the core dynamic: the debt is not โ€œours.โ€ It was not contracted in the interests of the British public. It was conjured into being by and for a ruling class whose loyalty lies elsewhereโ€”primarily with the financial aristocracy that treats public debt as a guaranteed income stream. These bondholders are not victims. They are parasites. And their pain from repudiation would be a moral good.

The โ€œcostsโ€ of default, we are told, would be immense: higher borrowing rates, lost credibility, economic instability. But look around. Britain already suffers from these things. The so-called โ€œcreditworthyโ€ British state has already produced:

  • Record-high taxation with declining services;
  • An NHS that cannot function;
  • A police force trained to enforce ideology, not law;
  • Billions funneled into foreign regimes and green grifts while domestic infrastructure crumbles.

If this is the price of โ€œfiscal responsibility,โ€ the case for repudiation is made.

And what of those who scream about market panic? Let them scream. The reality is that the real economy is already breaking under the strain of debt service and inflation. The only ones left to frighten are the fund managers and central bankers who live on yield and believe the stateโ€™s role is to guarantee their portfolio returns. Let them suffer.

The rise in precious metals prices is not speculative froth. It is a referendum on the entire post-1971 fiat regime. And it is delivering its verdict: guilty.

The goldโ€“silver ratio, which ballooned to absurd levels in past decades (100:1 in 2020), is now collapsing back toward historical normsโ€”not because the market is rediscovering Roman coinage standards, but because silver is breaking free from its paper prison. Industrial scarcity and monetary debasement are converging. And when silver finally reprices, it wonโ€™t move incrementally. It will gap, because suppressed markets always do. The lesson is this: a currency can survive dishonesty for a time, but it cannot survive arithmetic.

The British state, like others in the West, has chosen to default not by refusal, but by deceit. It is taxing more, printing more, and delivering less. Mercadente simply proposes that we replace this cowardice with clarity. Instead of continuing the lie, say the truth: this debt is not legitimate. We will not pay it.

And when that happens, let the bondholders howl. Let the foreign governments clutch their IOUs in disbelief. Let the politicians weep about โ€œcredibility.โ€ What will remain is a country no longer shackled to its own fiscal destruction.

That is not ruin. That is rebirth.


Discover more from The Libertarian Alliance

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

3 comments


  1. Amen! It is worth noting that libertarians at the USA’s Cato Institute, an organization I respect, appear to have recently embraced the technocratic approach of limiting the growth of debt, to 3% of GDP for example, rather than a balanced budget amendment, because fiscal balance is no longer in reach within even a very wide “Overton window.” First, such rules have failed in Europe and Britain and second, that approaches condemns future generations to indefinite debt servitude. Bring the jubilee!


  2. I’m only surprised that The Libertarian Alliance hasn’t held one of its annual shindigs at Mr Pozeram’s motel. Discussions about private property societies over milkshakes, bloody cheeseburgers and fries may broaden the popular appeal of these ideas. It would also be an opportunity to inquire into certain unpleasant rumours about Mr Pozeram, especially the one that never seems to go away: that he bumped off his late aunt and buried her in a drain off Route 66.


    • My understanding is that Mr Pozeram’s establishment is highly respectable and that the bathroom fittings are especially praised by guests for their cleanliness.

Leave a Reply